Issue - meetings

The Provision of Handyman and Cleaning Services at BDC Business Centres

Meeting: 21/06/2021 - Executive (Item 10)

The Provision of Handyperson and Cleaning Services at Bolsover District Council Business Centres

(Paragraph 3)

Additional documents:

Decision:

RESOLVED that –

 

1)    the appointment of the preferred supplier – aAFD Services Ltd – to provide cleaning services at Pleasley Vale Business Park and the Tangent Business Hub, in line with their tender submission, be supported

 

2)    the appointment of the preferred supplied – Phosters (FM) Ltd – to provide Handyperson services at Pleasley Vale Business Park and the Tangent Business Hub, in line with their tender submission, be supported

 

3)    the Head of Property Services and Housing Repairs be given delegated authority to appoint the preferred suppliers.

Minutes:

Executive considered a report of the Portfolio Holder – Growth / Economic Development that reported the outcome of a procurement exercise for the delivery of cleaning and handyperson services at the business centres – Pleasley Vale Business Park and the Tangent Business Hub.  The report sought approval to award two contracts, one for cleaning services and one for handyperson services.

 

Moved by Councillor Liz Smyth and seconded by Councillor Mary Dooley

RESOLVED that –

 

1)    the appointment of the preferred supplier – aAFD Services Ltd – to provide cleaning services at Pleasley Vale Business Park and the Tangent Business Hub, in line with their tender submission, be supported.

 

2)    the appointment of the preferred supplied – Phosters (FM) Ltd – to provide Handyperson services at Pleasley Vale Business Park and the Tangent Business Hub, in line with their tender submission, be supported.

 

3)    the Head of Property Services and Housing Repairs be given delegated authority to appoint the preferred suppliers.

 

(Head of Property Services and Housing)

 

REASON FOR DECISION:

Following completion of the tender exercise both bidding companies provided the most competitive bids and scored well on quality.

 

OTHER OPTIONS CONSIDERED:

An alternative option was set out in the report.  This was rejected due to the additional costs that would be incurred.

[Paragraph 3]