Minutes:
The Business Growth Manager provided an update on the main Business Growth Strategy to Members.
This was the first briefing to the new committee and outlined the priorities for the Development Directorate for 2019-23. When considering the six priorities, the following was noted:
The Business Growth Manager also noted that following the recent District Council election, it would be appropriate to review the Strategy and Action Plan as it came to the end of its lifecycle to ensure that new Members priorities were being addressed.
A Member queried the four areas of delivery under the Working with Partners strand. The officer directed Members to the action plan appendices for further detail - the four areas were Business Support, Business Engagement, Social Value Index, and OPE.
A Member queried who was part of the OPE team. The officer noted that this was a national team. As a result of the unsuccessful LUF bid the area had been identified as having public buildings and land which could benefit from redevelopment. By taking part in the current consultation exercise this would put the area in a strong position when future funding was announced.
A Member questioned why Dragonfly had no clear target dates assigned within the Enabling Housing Growth action plan. The officer noted that these could be included in future updates once they had been decided.
The Monitoring Officer advised Members that service level agreements between the Council and Dragonfly were currently in production including specification of services, all KPIs and targets, with a target date of completion by the end of August to then enable approval by Executive in September.
A Member noted that when looking at industry development within the District, there seemed to be limited focus on promoting the opportunities in the immediate vicinity of M1 junction 28. The officer noted that there was no availability of land for start-ups within that part of the District, however, the Development team were aware of opportunities across the border within both Mansfield and Ashfield. The Council hoped to instead use revenue budget to create a support package offer for all businesses within that part of the District to include business support, engagement, cost of living support, and streamlining of processes. The Council would like to create a stronger online presence to engage with businesses and this would benefit from further support from Members. The Development team had seen a significant increase in business engagement because of the pandemic and were trying to maintain the links created.
A Member suggested using a business-to-business scheme to encourage greater networking and development of support networks.
A Member asked for clarification on how the £1.9m UKSPF monies was distributed across the four strands outlined in the Working with Partners action plan. The Senior Economic Development Officer (Growth & Investment) advised that the funding allocated to the Development team was split as follows:
Tourism and Culture £78,000
Business Growth Grants Scheme £228,212
Net Zero Hyper Local Innovation programme £300,000
Small Business Support Scheme £95,000
Visitor Economy Business Support £88,000
The Business Growth Manager reminded Members that the £1.9m was being managed by the Leader’s Executive & Partnerships team with only a portion being delivered by the Development team. The other monies allocated were being directed towards youth engagement work and diversionary activities amongst other projects. Furthermore, the monies allocated for redevelopment of Oxcroft House could now be reallocated due to the site being let.
A Member was aware of resident concerns in relation to future development at Pleasley Vale, particularly in relation to potential conversion of buildings or development of flats. They were aware that this was not the only option available and asked for greater clarity within the service level agreement with Dragonfly Management so that the objectives and targets in relation to the site were clear to all. The Business Growth Manager noted that consultation would take place with both residents and tenants. Specific work on flood modelling had also been commissioned to establish the full-scale of potential development. The team was benefiting from the Pleasley Vale officer’s planning knowledge to ensure that development proposals identified were sustainable in the long-term for both the Authority and the community.
Moved by Councillor Phil Smith and seconded by Councillor Janet Tait
RESOLVED that the report and feedback on progress be noted.
(Business Growth Manager, Dragonfly Management (Bolsover) Ltd.))
Supporting documents: