Minutes:
Committee considered a report in relation to the above application presented by the Development Management and Land Charges Manager, who gave details of the application and highlighted the location and features of the site and key issues. The planning application sought approval for 2 three-storey buildings and 1 two-storey building that would deliver 9 one-bedroom flats at the ground floor and 9 two-bedroom two-storey flats, that would be delivered on the second and third floors of the building.
The application had been deferred from the Committee’s 16th April 2025 meeting to allow officers to negotiate further contributions if viability increased.
Stephen K. Haslam spoke in favour of the application (on behalf of Mitchell Proctor Architects, the agent).
To a question on the enforcement of contributions following any increased viability, the Development Management and Land Charges Manager noted this was a complex area as assumptions were prescriptive regarding viability and were included in the agreement – any profit margin above 20% was seen as reasonable and would result in a 70% / 30% split of shared additional profit, with the Council prioritised.
This protocol would also entice all developers to seek additional profits above 20%.
A Member stated the current site was not attractive and the proposed development was desirable, but shared reservations on the 20% profit threshold before additional contributions would be sought.
Moved by Councillor John Ritchie and seconded by Councillor Rob Hiney-Saunders
RESOLVED that application no. 23/00439/FUL be APPROVED upon no objections being received from the Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA), subject to the following conditions, any other conditions recommended by the LLFA, and upon completion of a S.106 agreement to secure a viability review mechanism at a suitable stage in the build out of the site, to enable the education, open space and playing pitch developer contributions to be made in circumstances where the development proves to be more profitable than envisaged in the viability appraisal:
Conditions
· Revised Location Plan (received 17th January 2025);
· Site Plan and Ground Floor Plan Plots 1-6 (Drawing no. 23 946 2 Rev. B, received 17th January 2025);
· Ground Floor Plots 7-9 and First Floor Plots 10-15 (Drawing no. 23 946 3 Rev. A, received 28th March 2025);
· Rooms in Roof Plots 10-15 and First Floor Plots 16-18 (Drawing no. 23 946 4 Rev. A, received 28th March 2025);
· Elevations (Drawing no. 23 946 5 Rev. C, received 28th March 2025);
· Sections (Drawing no. 23 946 6 Rev. A, received 28th March 2025);
· Hard and Soft Landscaping (Drawing no. 23 946 7 Rev. D, received 17th January 2025).
· Bedrooms 30 dB LAeq (15 Minutes) (2300 hrs – 0700 hrs);
· Living/Bedrooms 35 dB LAeq (15 Minutes) (0700 hrs – 2300 hrs);
· All Other Habitable Rooms 40 dB LAeq (15 Minutes) (0700 hrs – 2300 hrs);
· All Habitable Rooms 45 dB LAmax to occur no more than 6 times per night (2300 hrs – 0700 hrs);
· Any outdoor amenity areas 55 dB LAeq (1 hour) (0700 hrs – 2300 hrs).
The scheme as approved shall be validated by a competent person and a validation report submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The approved scheme shall be implemented in full and retained thereafter.
a) A Phase I contaminated land assessment (desk-study) shall be undertaken and approved in writing by the local planning authority.
b) The contaminated land assessment shall include a desk-study with details of the history of the site use including:
· the likely presence of potentially hazardous materials and substances,
· their likely nature, extent and scale,
· whether or not they originated from the site,
· a conceptual model of pollutant-receptor linkages,
· an assessment of the potential risks to human health, property (existing or proposed) including buildings, crops, livestock, pets, woodland and service lines and pipes, adjoining land, ground waters and surface waters, ecological systems, archaeological sites and ancient monuments,
· details of a site investigation strategy (if potential contamination is identified) to effectively characterise the site based on the relevant information discovered by the desk study and justification for the use or not of appropriate guidance. The site investigation strategy shall, where necessary, include relevant soil, ground gas, surface and groundwater sampling/monitoring as identified by the desk-study strategy
The site investigation shall be carried out by a competent person in accordance with the current U.K. requirements for sampling and analysis. A report of the site investigation shall be submitted to the local planning authority for approval.
Where the site investigation identifies unacceptable levels of contamination, a detailed remediation scheme to bring the site to a condition suitable for the intended use by removing unacceptable risks to human health, buildings and other property and the natural and historical environment shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The submitted scheme shall have regard to relevant current guidance. The approved scheme shall include all works to be undertaken, proposed remediation objectives and remediation criteria and site management procedures. The scheme shall ensure that the site will not qualify as contaminated land under Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in relation to the intended use of the land after remediation.
The developer shall give at least 14 days’ notice to the Local Planning Authority and Environmental Health Division prior to commencing works in connection with the remediation scheme.
a) The approved remediation works required by 7 above have been carried out in full in compliance with the approved methodology and best practice.
b) If during the construction and/or demolition works associated with the development hereby approved any suspected areas of contamination are discovered, which have not previously been identified, then all works shall be suspended until the nature and extent of the contamination is assessed and a report submitted and approved in writing by the local planning authority and the local planning authority shall be notified as soon as is reasonably practicable of the discovery of any suspected areas of contamination. The suspect material shall be re-evaluated through the process described in 6b to 7 above and satisfy 8a above.
c) Upon completion of the remediation works required by 7 and 8a above a validation report prepared by a competent person shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The validation report shall include details of the remediation works and Quality Assurance/Quality Control results to show that the works have been carried out in full and in accordance with the approved methodology. Details of any validation sampling and analysis to show the site has achieved the approved remediation standard, together with the necessary waste management documentation shall be included.
· Parking of vehicles of site operatives and visitors (including measures taken to ensure satisfactory access and movement for existing occupiers of neighbouring properties during construction);
· Locations for loading/unloading and storage of plant, waste and construction materials; Method of preventing mud and dust being carried onto the highway;
· Arrangements for turning vehicles;
· Arrangements to receive abnormal loads or unusually large vehicles;
· Highway Condition survey;
· Methods of communicating the Construction Management Plan to staff, visitors and neighbouring residents and businesses.
· Sample of brick and stone;
· Sample of slate / ridge tiles;
· Sample panel of lime pointing;
· Details of stone stringcourse;
· 1:20 details of windows and doors, including showing windows set back in 100mm reveal;
· Details of glass balustrades and screen to full height openings;
· Details of conservation rooflights;
· Details of cast aluminium rainwater goods / rise and fall brackets;
· Hard and soft landscaping (details of steps, retaining walls / features, coping stones, balustrades, and any paving scheme, including threshold paving).
The development shall be implemented and retained in accordance with the approved details.
a) evidence to demonstrate that surface water disposal via infiltration or watercourse are not reasonably practical;
b) evidence of existing positive drainage to public sewer and the current points of connection; and
c) the means of restricting the discharge to public sewer to the existing rate less a minimum 30 % reduction, based on the existing peak discharge rate during a 1 in 1 year storm event, to allow for climate change.
Informatives
· Informing, respecting and showing courtesy to those affected by the work;
· Minimising the impact of deliveries, parking and work on the public highway;
· Contributing to and supporting the local community and economy; and,
· Working to create a positive and enduring impression, and promoting the Code.
· Access for emergency service vehicles, both during the demolition and construction phases of the proposal, should be provided in accordance with Approved Document B (Vols 1 and 2) Section B5.
· Site details should be provided to Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service with contact details and expected timeframes for the build.
· A full Building Regulations Consultation.
Statement of Decision Process
Officers have worked positively and pro-actively with the applicant to address issues raised during the consideration of the application. The proposal has been considered against the policies and guidelines adopted by the Council and the decision has been taken in accordance with the guidelines of the Framework.
Equalities Statement
Section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 places a statutory duty on public authorities in the exercise of their functions to have due regard to the need to eliminate discrimination and advance equality of opportunity between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it (i.e., “the Public Sector Equality Duty”).
In this case, there is no evidence to suggest that the development proposals would have any direct or indirect negative impacts on any person with a protected characteristic or any group of people with a shared protected characteristic.
Human Rights Statement
The specific Articles of the European Commission on Human Rights (‘the ECHR’) relevant to planning include Article 6 (Right to a fair and public trial within a reasonable time), Article 8 (Right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence), Article 14 (Prohibition of discrimination) and Article 1 of Protocol 1 (Right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions and protection of property).
It is considered that assessing the effects that a proposal will have on individuals and weighing these against the wider public interest in determining whether development should be allowed to proceed is an inherent part of the decision-making process. In carrying out this ‘balancing exercise’ in the above report, officers are satisfied that the potential for these proposals to affect any individual’s (or any group of individuals’) human rights has been addressed proportionately and in accordance with the requirements of the ECHR.
Supporting documents: