Minutes:
Members raised further queries relating to the following matters to which BDC officers responded;
· The proposal to widen and clear the culvert on Creswell Road, Clowne
· Environmental Impact Assessment 2017 and Addendum
· Viability of the site – amounts of funding under S106 monies
· Sewage flood risk (STWA)
· Treble Bob roundabout improvements if the proposed development did not go ahead
· Clarity on greenbelt area
Councillor Duncan McGregor referred to the key matters as set out in the report and that Reserved Matters would cover most of the concerns raised at this meeting, and he gave notice of motion.
Councillor Rob Hiney-Saunders felt that some issues had not been given enough weight to, for example, the unassessed traffic and parking in Clowne, and based on the data that underpinned it he felt it should be given more weight. He added that Active Travel England, the experts in non-car travel from a statutory point of view, had severe concerns. There was also no confirmation on the culvert expansion, and in terms of material impacts that were not planning issues, there was unassessed material impact of the community infrastructure, particular the community centre and the cemetery.
Councillor Deborah Watson raised that if the application were refused, housing in Clowne would still be needed and this could ultimately be done in piece meal.
Councillor John Ritchie referred to the wording in relation to Development Plan Policy SS2 under the heading of Principle of Development in the report, and echoed Councillor Watson’s comments.
Councillor Phil Smith acknowledged the S106 solution and the fact that additional reports had been undertaken, noting the planning considerations had been met.
Moved by Councillor Duncan McGregor and seconded by Councillor John Ritchie that the application be approved.
Members requested a recorded vote be taken.
For the motion: 8. Against the motion: 2 (Councillors Rob Hiney-Saunders and Carol Wood).
The motion was carried and it was therefore RESOLVED that the application be approved subject to prior entry into a s.106 legal agreement containing the following planning obligations:
A: Highways
· The delivery of Treble Bob Roundabout Scheme
· The delivery of the M1 Jct 30 Interim and Full Schemes
B: Active Travel & Passenger Transport Strategy
C: Travel Plan
· £50,000 to Derbyshire County Council as a Travel Plan contribution for the implementation of a site wide Travel Plan
D: Affordable Housing
· 10% Provision and Tenure Type
E: Education
· The transfer of serviced and accessible land to Derbyshire Country Council Education
· The delivery of a new primary school by the applicant or a full contribution of £9,500,000 to Derbyshire Council Education for the delivery a new Primary School
· Secondary School Contribution of £8,258,879
F: Health Care
· £1,800,000 contribution towards to the Integrated Care Board to improve health care facilities.
G: Open Space Management Provisions
H: Provision for delivery of Skylark Mitigation
I: Viability Reappraisal & Deferred Contributions
· A Viability Reappraisal requirement to establish the amount (if any) which is available for calculation of the Deferred Contributions.
Deferred Contributions:
· SEND Contribution: Payment of £1,463,597 to Derbyshire County Council towards the provision of Special Educational Needs and Disability
· Library Contribution: Payment of £126,840.00 to Derbyshire County Council towards local library stocks and measures to increase capacity.
AND subject to the following conditions, which in consultation with the Chair and Vice Chair of Planning Committee, the Assistant Director Planning & Planning Policy be given delegated authority to make any minor changes to the precise wording of the planning condition wording if necessary,
· The Design and Access Statement, including the Design Concept Character Areas
· The Drainage Strategy Report & Appendices Ref: CGV-AEC-XX-XX-RP-CE-02501
· The Harlesthorpe Dam Technical Note dated 15th May 2018
· Noise Impact Information (dated 29th May 2018)
· Air Quality details (dated 29th May 2018)
· Flood Risk Assessment Ref: CGV-AEC-XX-XX-RP-CE-02500
· Phasing Plan Reference CN-PP-01 Revision A
· BNG Metric prepared by FPCR
· C3 Dwellings 1800
· C2 Carehome 7000m2 and ancillary retail/services of 1750m2
· C1 Hotel with ancillary restaurant, leisure, healthcare, of 5743m2 and 130 bedrooms
· F1 2 Form Primary School 1353m2
· E(i)(ii)(iii) Business Park (office) 14340m2
· B2 Business Park (general industry) 33502m2
· B8 Business Park (warehouse and Distribution) 38228m2
or sui generis uses comprising a mixture of the approved uses only, within the maximum cumulative floorspace thresholds set out for each Use Class.
a. Details of structural landscaping and implementation schedule,
b. The timing and phasing of the offsite highway’s improvements as proposed in the Transport Assessment (Aecom November 2017 reference 60556776), the Transport Assessment Addendum dated April 2018 reference 60556776 and the Transport Statement dated March 2023), including offsite pedestrian crossings and onsite highways connections to existing strategic highway infrastructure including footways and cycle paths.
c. Provision of education facilities within the site.
d. Provision of 10 hectares of Formal Green Space including a Town Park and Central Village Green.
e. A Sports Strategy, which details the timing and delivery of any sports provision within the development.
The development thereafter shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details,
A. Site Characterisation
An investigation and risk assessment for each parcel / phase in addition to any assessment provided with the planning application, must be completed in accordance with a scheme to assess the nature and extent of any contamination on the site, whether or not it originates on the site. The contents of the scheme are subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The investigation and risk assessment must be undertaken by competent persons and a written report of the findings must be produced. The written report is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The report of the findings must include:
(i) a survey of the extent, scale and nature of contamination;
(ii) an assessment of the potential risks to:
• human health,
•property (existing or proposed) including buildings, crops, livestock, pets, woodland and service lines and pipes,
• adjoining land,
• groundwaters and surface waters,
• ecological systems,
• archaeological sites and ancient monuments;
(iii) an appraisal of remedial options, and proposal of the preferred option(s).
This must be conducted in accordance with DEFRA and the Environment Agency’s ‘Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination, CLR 11’.
B. Submission of Remediation Scheme
A detailed remediation scheme to bring the site to a condition suitable for the intended use by removing unacceptable risks to human health, buildings and other property and the natural and historical environment must be prepared and is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The scheme must include all works to be undertaken, proposed remediation objectives and remediation criteria, timetable of works and site management procedures. The scheme must ensure that the site will not qualify as contaminated land under Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in relation to the intended use of the land after remediation.
C. Implementation of Approved Remediation Scheme
The approved remediation scheme must be carried out in accordance with its terms prior to the commencement of development other than that required to carry out remediation, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The Local Planning Authority must be given two weeks written notification of commencement of the remediation scheme works.
Following completion of measures identified in the approved remediation scheme, a verification report (referred to in PPS23 as a validation report) that demonstrates the effectiveness of the remediation carried out must be produced and is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority.
D. Reporting of Unexpected Contamination
In the event that contamination is found at any time when carrying out the approved development that was not previously identified it must be reported in writing immediately to the Local Planning Authority. An investigation and risk assessment must be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of condition 1, and where remediation is necessary a remediation scheme must be prepared in accordance with the requirements of condition 2, which is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority.
Following completion of measures identified in the approved remediation scheme a verification report must be prepared, which is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority in accordance with condition 3.
E. Importation of soil
In the event that it is proposed to import soil onto site in connection with the development, the proposed soil shall be sampled at source and analysed in a laboratory that is accredited under the MCERTS Chemical testing of Soil Scheme for all parameters requested (where this is available), the results of which shall be submitted to the LPA for consideration. Only the soil approved in writing by the LPA shall be used on site.
1) The programme and methodology for archaeological evaluation shall take place before the consideration of the reserved matters ‘layout’ details for that phase;
(2) The programme and methodology for further archaeological work following evaluation, comprising preservation in situ or mitigation excavation as appropriate.
(3) The programme of post investigation assessment;
(4) Provision to be made for analysis of the site investigation and recording;
(5) Provision to be made for publication and dissemination of the analysis and records of the site investigation;
(6) Provision to be made for archive deposition of the analysis and records of the site investigation; and
(7) Nomination of a competent person or person/organisation to undertake the works set out within the Written Scheme of Investigation.
No development shall take place other than in accordance with the archaeological Written Scheme of Investigation.
No phase of the development shall be occupied until the site investigation and post investigation assessment for that phase has been completed in accordance with the programme set out in the Written Scheme of Investigation and the provision to be made for analysis, publication and dissemination of results and archive deposition has been secured.
No development in any phase or part thereof in question shall commence until the details have been approved by the Local Planning Authority in writing. Any drainage scheme should be carried out in broad accordance with the principles outlined within:
· Clowne Garden Village, Drainage Strategy Review, Document Ref: GCV-ACM-XX-XX-TN-CE-00502 (21 December 2022),
· Clowne Garden Village, Derbyshire Drainage Strategy Report; Project Number: 60556776 CGV-AEC-XX-XX-RP-CE-02501 Rev 01 (December, 2017) and
· Clowne Garden Village, Flood Risk Assessment; Project Number: 60556776 CGV-AEC-XX-XXRP-CE-02500 Rev 01 (December, 2017), “including any subsequent amendments or updates to those documents as approved by the Flood Risk Management Team” And DEFRA’s Non-statutory technical standards for sustainable drainage systems (March 2015),
· DEFRA’s Non-statutory technical standards for sustainable drainage systems (March 2015),
Each Drainage Scheme should include:-
A) An assessment of the potential for disposing of surface water by means of a sustainable drainage system (SuDS) in accordance with the principles set out in NPPF (or any subsequent version). Where the assessment demonstrates that SuDS is feasible, the details provided shall include such drainage designed in accordance with the non-statutory technical standards for SuDS and the Local Planning Authority's local standards.
An assessment of any impact on the Harlesthorpe Dam and necessary mitigation.
Details of how all foul water infrastructure is to be provided (including timescales for provision and details of offsite works and the point of connection [s] into the existing public sewer) to serve the Zone, or part thereof in question.
Details of the outfall for surface water, including surface water drainage features (including SuDS, and information demonstrating where possible the integration of SuDs features into the green infrastructure and layout of the site), sewerage and outfalls to watercourse plus any other necessary infrastructure identified as part of a surface /storm water management plan.
Surface water from vehicle parking and hard standing areas (excluding those associated with residential properties) shall be passed through an interceptor of adequate capacity prior to discharge to a public sewer. Roof drainage shall not be passed through an interceptor.
B) The works as approved under part A) of this Condition shall be carried out concurrently with the development of the Zone in question and no part of such Zone, including any buildings, shall be occupied until the said works have been completed and are operational in relation to the said part of the Unity Zone.
C) All Zones shall be developed with separate systems of drainage for foul and surface water on and off site and no additional surface water shall discharge to the existing local public sewer network.
a) Environment Management Responsibilities;
b) Construction Activities, and Timings, including details of any temporary access arrangements;
c) Plant and Equipment, including loading and unloading, including arrangements to receive abnormal loads or unusually large vehicles;
d) Construction traffic routes and points of access/egress to be used by construction vehicles, and arrangements for turning vehicles;
e) Details of site compounds, offices, welfare facilities and areas to be used for the storage of materials;
f) Utilities and Services;
g) Emergency planning & Incident Reporting;
h) Contact details for site managers and details of management lines of reporting to be updated as different phases come forward;
i) Method of preventing mud and dust from being carried onto the highway
j) Highway Condition survey
k) On site control procedures reference:
· Traffic mitigation measures including traffic management and parking
· Temporary haulage routes
· Air and Dust quality
· Noise and vibration
· Waste and Resource Management
· Agricultural Soils and Materials
· Temporary surface water drainage during construction
· Protection of Controlled Waters
· Trees, Hedgerows and Scrub
· Ecology
· Archaeological and Cultural Heritage
· Visual and Lighting
· Utilities and Services
· Protection of water resources
· Protection of species and habitats
l) Detailed phasing plan to show any phasing, different developers and/or constructors to be updated regularly
m) Details for the monitoring and review of the construction process including traffic mitigation (to include a review process of the Construction Environmental Management Plan during development).
n) Methods of communicating the Construction Management Plan to staff, visitors and neighbouring business and residents. Reason: In the interests of the safe operation of the adopted highway in the lead into development both during the demolition and construction phase of the development.
o) Biodiversity
· Risk assessment of potentially damaging construction activities.
· Identification of “biodiversity protection zones”.
· Practical measures (both physical measures and sensitive working practices) to avoid or reduce impacts during construction. These must include badger survey prior to commencement of each relevant phase or sub phase of development, nesting bird checks, site clearance methodologies for amphibians, reptiles and brown hare.
· Practical measures (both physical measures and sensitive working practices) to avoid or reduce impacts during construction (may be provided as a set of method statements).
· The location and timing of sensitive works to avoid harm to biodiversity features.
· The times during construction when specialist ecologists need to be present on site to oversee works.
· Responsible persons and lines of communication.
· The role and responsibilities on site of an ecological clerk of works (ECoW) or similarly competent person.
· Use of protective fences, exclusion barriers and warning signs.
Any development hereby permitted shall be carried out only in accordance with the approved CEMP.
a) Description and location of features to be retained, created, enhanced, and managed, as per the approved biodiversity metric (FPCR), and clearly quantifying how each phase contributes to the overall net gain figures.
b) Aims and objectives of management, in line with desired habitat conditions detailed in the metric.
c) Appropriate management methods and practices to achieve aims and objectives.
d) Prescriptions for management actions.
e) Preparation of a work schedule (including a 30-year work plan capable of being rolled forward in perpetuity).
f) Details of the body or organization responsible for implementation of the plan.
g) A monitoring schedule to assess the success of the habitat creation and enhancement measures at intervals of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 years.
h) A set of remedial measures to be applied if conservation aims and objectives of the plan are not being met.
i) Detailed habitat enhancements for wildlife, in line with British Standard BS 42021:2022.
j) Details of underpasses, offset gullies and drop kerbs in the road network to safeguard wildlife.
k) Detailed specifications for open water habitats to provide biodiversity benefits.
l) Requirement for a statement of compliance upon completion of planting and enhancement works in each phase.
The document shall also include details of the legal and funding mechanism(s) by which the long-term implementation of the plan will be secured by the developer with the management body(ies) responsible for its delivery. The approved plan will be implemented in accordance with the approved details.
The information shall include:
· an individual tree assessment of all trees which are proposed to be retained in accordance with the EIA representing the base case scenario in respect of tree removal at the site.
· The measures which will be implemented to secure their protection during the course of the development and retention thereafter.
No development relevant to that phase shall commence until the approved tree protection measures have been put in place and the development of the relevant phase shall thereafter proceed in full accordance with the approved Tree Constraints Plan, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
· Details of mitigation measures to be included the proposals
· Details of base lines
· Timing / Phasing of monitoring
· Location of monitoring points
· How the results will be assessed
· What actions will be considered at each review point.
· Bedrooms 30 dB LAeq (15 Minutes) (2300 hrs – 0700 hrs)
· Living/Bedrooms 35 dB LAeq (15 Minutes) (0700 hrs – 2300 hrs)
· All Other Habitable Rooms 40 dB LAeq (15 Minutes) (0700 hrs – 2300 hrs)
· All Habitable Rooms 45 dB LAmax to occur no more than 6 times per hour
· Any outdoor amenity areas 55 dB LAeq (1 hour) (0700 hrs – 2300 hrs)
Prior to the first occupation of the dwelling(s) hereby approved, the scheme as approved shall be validated by a competent person and a validation report submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority.
The references in this condition to rating level and residual sound level have the same meaning as those defined in BS4142: 2014 Methods for rating and assessing industrial and commercial sound.
Statement of Decision Process
Officers have worked positively and pro-actively with the applicant to address issues raised during the consideration of the application. The proposal has been considered against the policies and guidelines adopted by the Council and the decision has been taken in accordance with the guidelines of the Framework.
The decision contains several pre-commencement conditions which are so fundamental to the development permitted that:
· it would have been otherwise necessary to refuse the whole permission;
or
· are necessary to address issues that require information to show that the development will or can be made safe, or
· address other impacts which need to be assessed to make the development acceptable to minimise and mitigate adverse impacts from the development.
Equalities Statement
Section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 places a statutory duty on public authorities in the exercise of their functions to have due regard to the need to eliminate discrimination and advance equality of opportunity between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it (i.e. “the Public Sector Equality Duty”).
In this case, there is no evidence to suggest that the development proposals would have any direct or indirect negative impacts on any person with a protected characteristic or any group of people with a shared protected characteristic.
Human Rights Statement
The specific Articles of the European Commission on Human Rights (‘the ECHR’) relevant to planning include Article 6 (Right to a fair and public trial within a reasonable time), Article 8 (Right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence), Article 14 (Prohibition of discrimination) and Article 1 of Protocol 1 (Right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions and protection of property).
It is considered that assessing the effects that a proposal will have on individuals and weighing these against the wider public interest in determining whether development should be allowed to proceed is an inherent part of the decision-making process. In carrying out this ‘balancing exercise’ in the above report, officers are satisfied that the potential for these proposals to affect any individual’s (or any group of individuals’) human rights has been addressed proportionately and in accordance with the requirements of the ECHR.