Minutes:
Committee considered a report in relation to the above application presented by the Development Management and Land Charges Manager, who gave details of the application and highlighted the location and features of the site and key issues. The application sought approval from the Committee for an Energy Storage System (ESS) at land at Hurst Farm, Tibshelf. The ESS would operate for a period of 40 years before the development was decommissioned and the land returned to its former state, except for the substation and associated infrastructure that would remain a permanent feature to be adopted by the Distribution Network Operator (DNO).
The application required the Committee’s consideration in accordance with the officer scheme of delegation, as it was recommended for approval but was contrary to countryside policies in the Council’s Local Plan.
Updated conditions were detailed in the supplementary document.
A Member provided thanks to the report and stated the site proved a substantial distance from the site of historical importance and that with natural tree foliage would be likely hidden / partially hidden for all but the winter months.
It was further noted there remained the need for nationally generated electricity to be stored in the UK to contribute all efforts towards the environment.
A Member noted a sympathetic rendering of the main buildings would contribute towards the proposed development’s place within the natural landscape.
A Member observed the applicant would provide the Council with additional documentation regarding the Habitat Management and Monitoring Plan (to ensure targets were met). It was accepted that the proposal was located on greenfield land and there remained a need to guarantee any noise and light generated did not impact local wildlife.
A Member added to the previously raised environmental benefits the national security benefits such a proposal would bring.
The Chair noted the M1 Motorway could be seen from the site of historical importance – the proposal would likely have far less presence on the asset.
9 in favour
0 against
Moved by Councillor Tom Munro and seconded by Councillor Phil Smith
RESOLVED that application no. 25/00302/FUL be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:
· Location Plan GBR_Hurst Farm_AD - SLP_07 – Drawing no. AD-SLP, received 23rd July 2025;
· Preliminary Design Layout GBR_Hurst_LP2-PDL-BESS_05 – Drawing no. LP2-PDL, received 10th October 2025;
· General Arrangement of Site Access - Drawing no. HFD-BWB-GEN-XX-DR-TR-101 S2 Rev. P7, received 10th October 2025;
· General Arrangement of Access from Site to Road – Overview – Drawing no. HFD-BWB-HML-00-DR-TR-100 S2 Rev. P8, received 10th October 2025;
· Landscape Strategy Plan – Drawing no. NT16771-020 Rev. P07, received 10th October 2015;
· Ecological Impact Assessment Tree Retention and Removal Plan – Drawing no. 16625-P05d, received 11th July 2025;
· Ecological Impact Assessment Bat Static Location Plan – Drawing no. 16625/P07, received 11th July 2025;
· MV Skid Elevations UK_EPD_MV Skid_00 – Drawing no. UK_EPD_MVS, received 30th July 2025;
· Tree Constraints Plan – Drawing no. 16625/P04c, received 11th July 2025;
· Existing and Proposed Ground Levels – Main Access GBR_Hurst-Existing and Proposed Ground Levels - Main Access Track_00 – Drawing no. 01, received 11th July 2025;
· Proposed Ground Levels GBR_Hurst-Proposed Ground Levels_00 – Drawing no. 01, received 11th July 2025;
· Proposed Ground Profiles – Energy Storage System Area GBR_Hurst_Proposed Ground Profiles – Energy Storage System Area_00 – Drawing no. 01, received 11th July 2025;
· Proposed Ground Profiles – Substation GBR_Hurst_Proposed Ground Profiles – Substation_00 – Drawing no. 01, received 11th July 2025;
· Emergency Access – Drawing no. HFD-BWB-GEN-XX-DR-TR-112 S2 Rev. P3, received 11th July 2025;
· Auxiliary Transformer GBR_EPD_Auxiliary Transformer_02 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_AUX, received 11th July 2025;
· BESS CCTV GBR_EPD_BESS CCTV_00 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_BCC, received 11th July 2025;
· BESS Lighting GBR_EPD_BESS Lightning_00 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_BLG, received 11th July 2025;
· BESS Security Fence GBR_EPD_BESS Security Fence_02 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_BSF, received 11th July 2025;
· BESS Security Gate GBR_EPD_BESS Gate_02 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_BSG, received 11th July 2025;
· DNO Generator GBR_Hurst_EPD_DNO Generator_00 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_DNO GEN, received 11th July 2025l
· DNO GRP GBR_Hurst_EPD_DNO GRP_00 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_DNO GRP, received 11th July 2025;
· EV Charger GBR_Hurst_EPD_EV Charger_00 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_EVC, received 11th July 2025;
· Entrance Wall and Gate GBR_EPD_Entrance Wall and Gate_00 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_EWG, received 11th July 2025;
· Backup Generator GBR_EPD_Backup Generator 20_00 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_G20, received 11th July 2025;
· GRP GBR_EPD_GRP_00 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_GRP, received 11th July 2025;
· Monitoring House / Communication Building GBR_EPD_Monitoring House/Communication Building_01 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_MH/CB, received 11th July 2025;
· Indicative Road Section GBR_EPD_Indicative Road Cross Section_01 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_RCS, received 11th July 2025;
· Spares Container GBR_EPD_Spares 40' Container_01 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_S40, received 11th July 2025;
· Storage GBR_EPD_Storage_00 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_STG, received 11th July 2025;
· Substation GBR_Hurst_EPD-Substation_00 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_SUB, received 11th July 2025;
· Toilet GBR_EPD_Toilet_01 – Drawing no. GBR_EPD_TLT, received 11th July 2025;
· BESS Enclosures UK_EPD_BESS Enclosures_00 – Drawing no. UK_EPD_BSS, received 11th July 2025;
· MV Skid UK_EPD_MV Skid_00 – Drawing no. UK_EPD_MVS, received 11th July 2025.
a) A Phase I contaminated land assessment (desk-study) shall be undertaken and approved in writing by the local planning authority.
b) The contaminated land assessment shall include a desk-study with details of the history of the site use including:
· the likely presence of potentially hazardous materials and substances,
· their likely nature, extent and scale,
· whether or not they originated from the site,
· a conceptual model of pollutant-receptor linkages,
· an assessment of the potential risks to human health, property (existing or proposed) including buildings, crops, livestock, pets, woodland and service lines and pipes, adjoining land, ground waters and surface waters, ecological systems, archaeological sites and ancient monuments,
· details of a site investigation strategy (if potential contamination is identified) to effectively characterise the site based on the relevant information discovered by the desk study and justification for the use or not of appropriate guidance. The site investigation strategy shall, where necessary, include relevant soil, ground gas, surface and groundwater sampling/monitoring as identified by the desk-study strategy
The site investigation shall be carried out by a competent person in accordance with the current U.K. requirements for sampling and analysis. A report of the site investigation shall be submitted to the local planning authority for approval.
Where the site investigation identifies unacceptable (having regard to relevant guidance) levels of contamination, a detailed remediation scheme to bring the site to a condition suitable for the intended use by removing unacceptable risks to human health, buildings and other property and the natural and historical environment shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The submitted scheme shall have regard to relevant current guidance. The approved scheme shall include all works to be undertaken, proposed remediation objectives and remediation criteria and site management procedures. The scheme shall ensure that the site will not qualify as contaminated land under Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in relation to the intended use of the land after remediation.
a) The approved remediation works required by condition 6 above have been carried out in full in compliance with the approved methodology and best practice.
b) If during the construction and/or demolition works associated with the development hereby approved any suspected areas of contamination are discovered, which have not previously been identified, then all works shall be suspended until the nature and extent of the contamination is assessed and a report submitted and approved in writing by the local planning authority and the local planning authority shall be notified as soon as is reasonably practicable of the discovery of any suspected areas of contamination. The suspect material shall be re-evaluated through the process described in conditions 5b to 6 above and satisfy 7a above.
c) Upon completion of the remediation works required by conditions 6 and 7a above a validation report prepared by a competent person shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The validation report shall include details of the remediation works and Quality Assurance / Quality Control results to show that the works have been carried out in full and in accordance with the approved methodology. Details of any validation sampling and analysis to show the site has achieved the approved remediation standard, together with the necessary waste management documentation shall be included.
a) Risk assessment of potentially damaging construction activities.
b) Identification of “biodiversity protection zones”.
c) Practical measures (both physical measures and sensitive working practices) to avoid or reduce impacts during construction to retained habitats, amphibians, water voles, nesting birds, hedgehog, bats and badger.
d) The location and timing of sensitive works to avoid harm to biodiversity features.
e) The times during construction when specialist ecologists need to be present on site to oversee works.
f) Responsible persons and lines of communication.
g) The role and responsibilities on site of an ecological clerk of works (ECoW) or similarly competent person.
h) Use of protective fences, exclusion barriers and warning signs.
The approved CEMP shall be adhered to and implemented throughout the construction period strictly in accordance with the approved details, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
· Parking of vehicle of site operatives and visitors (including measures taken to ensure satisfactory access and movement for existing occupiers of neighbouring properties during construction);
· Advisory routes for construction traffic;
· Any temporary access to the site;
· Locations for loading/unloading and storage of plant, waste and construction materials;
· Method of preventing mud and dust being carried onto the highway;
· Arrangements for turning vehicles;
· Arrangements to receive abnormal loads or unusually large vehicles;
· Highway Condition survey;
· Methods of communicating the Construction Management Plan to staff, visitors and neighbouring residents and businesses.
a. Alex Eaton, BWB Consulting, June 2025, Flood Risk Assessment, Revision P03.
b. A Shademani, BWB Consulting, April 2025, Indicative Drainage Strategy Sheets 1-3, Drawing numbers: NT16771-020, 243787-BWB-ZZ-XX-D-W-0002 & 243787-BWB-ZZ-XX-D-W-0003, Revision P05.
c. A Shademani, BWB Consulting, April 2025, Indicative SuDS Sections, Drawing Number: 243787-BWB-ZZ-XX-D-W-0004, Revision P01.
d. A Shademani, June 2025, Sustainable Drainage Statement, Revision P03.
e. And DEFRA’s national standards for sustainable drainage systems (June 2025), have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details.
1. The programme and methodology of site investigation and recording
2. The programme for post investigation assessment
3. Provision to be made for analysis of the site investigation and recording
4. Provision to be made for publication and dissemination of the analysis and records of the site investigation
5. Provision to be made for archive deposition of the analysis and records of the site investigation
6. Nomination of a competent person or persons/organization to undertake the works set out within the Written Scheme of Investigation.
No development shall take place other than in accordance with the approved archaeological Written Scheme of Investigation.
a) a scheme of intrusive investigations has been carried out on site to establish the risks posed to the development by past shallow coal mining activity; and
b) any remediation works and/or mitigation measures to address land instability arising from coal mining legacy, as may be necessary, have been implemented on site in full in order to ensure that the site is made safe and stable for the development proposed.
The intrusive site investigations and remedial works shall be carried out in accordance with authoritative UK guidance.
1. details of the retention of the substation and associated apparatus to be adopted by the DNO, retention of any approved boundary treatment(s), retained and new landscape planting, and biodiversity enhancements to remain in perpetuity; and,
2. a written scheme of restoration for returning the site to an arable field on cessation of energy storage at the site.
The approved scheme of restoration shall be implemented and completed within 12 months of the end of the 40-year period taken from the date submitted under condition 26.
Reasons for Conditions
Statement of Decision Process
Officers have worked positively and pro-actively with the applicant to address issues raised during the consideration of the application. The proposal has been considered against the policies and guidelines adopted by the Council and the decision has been taken in accordance with the guidelines of the Framework.
Equalities Statement
Section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 places a statutory duty on public authorities in the exercise of their functions to have due regard to the need to eliminate discrimination and advance equality of opportunity between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it (i.e., “the Public Sector Equality Duty”).
In this case, there is no evidence to suggest that the development proposals would have any direct or indirect negative impacts on any person with a protected characteristic or any group of people with a shared protected characteristic.
Human Rights Statement
The specific Articles of the European Commission on Human Rights (‘the ECHR’) relevant to planning include Article 6 (Right to a fair and public trial within a reasonable time), Article 8 (Right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence), Article 14 (Prohibition of discrimination) and Article 1 of Protocol 1 (Right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions and protection of property).
It is considered that assessing the effects that a proposal will have on individuals and weighing these against the wider public interest in determining whether development should be allowed to proceed is an inherent part of the decision-making process. In carrying out this ‘balancing exercise’ in the above report, officers are satisfied that the potential for these proposals to affect any individual’s (or any group of individuals’) human rights has been addressed proportionately and in accordance with the requirements of the ECHR.
Supporting documents: