Minutes:
Committee considered a report in relation to the above application presented by the Development Management and Land Charges Manager, who gave details of the application and highlighted the location and features of the site and key issues. The application sought approval for the change of use of the first and second floors from ancillary accommodation (previously used in association with the existing ground-floor takeaway) to a 3-bedroom house in multiple occupation (HMO) which falls within use class C4. The application had been referred to the Committee by Councillor Jane Yates for the reason outlined in the report.
Parish Councillor Andrew Stevens spoke against the application on behalf of Shirebrook Town Council.
A statement on the application was read out on behalf of Councillor Jane Yates.
Rayan Qureshi (the applicant) spoke in favour of the application.
To a question on parking, Rayan Qureshi informed 1 parking space remained available with the other 2 having been offered freely for public use.
In answer to a question, Rayan Qureshi informed work on the property’s exterior envelope would include insulation, the replacement of the roof and the improvement of the frontage.
The number of en-suite bedrooms intended was confirmed.
The Development Management and Land Charges Manager informed, if approval was given, subsequent building regulation requirements would ensure all safety (including fire safety), energy efficiency and sanitatory standards were met.
Members acknowledged the concerns raised on the concentration of the District’s HMOs in Shirebrook.
The Senior Devolution Lead for Planning Policy, Strategic Growth and Housing reported the current numbers of Licensed and non-licensed HMOs in Shirebrook and data on the number of enquiries, complaints and investigations relating to HMOs across the District as provided by the Joint Environmental Health Team, the Council’s core service relating to HMOs. This information highlighted that the small number of complaints received for 2025, less than one a month, reflected that based on available evidence the scale of reported registered remained low.
It was added that despite this low level of complaints, the Council took the disturbance that could be created by residential and commercial properties seriously and that the Council would be promoting the services of its Joint Environmental Health Team to ensure that members of the public were aware of how to report any problems to the Council.
All reports were treated seriously and would be investigated and responded to by the Joint Environmental Health Team.
A clarification was sought on the access points of the property. Access to the HMO would be via the front and rear doors serving the ground floor takeaway use.
The Development Management and Land Charges Manager reassured that, as detailed in the list of recommendations, a management plan for the accommodation (which must include the vetting of occupants, day-to-day management of the site and methods for dealing with and reporting of incidents of anti-social behaviour) would need to be submitted to the Council before any first occupation.
5 in favour
2 against
Moved by Councillor Tom Munro and seconded by Councillor Phil Smith
RESOLVED that planning application no. 25/00446/FUL be APPROVED subject to the following planning conditions:
· Existing / Proposed Site Plan (KAP-SITE-001);
· Existing Elevations (No External Changes) (KAP-EX-002);
· Proposed Floor Plans (KAP-PRO-001);
· Noise Impact Assessment;
· Odour Impact Assessment received on the 28th January 2026.
Reasons for Conditions:
Advisory Note:
Statement of Decision Process
Equalities Statement
Section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 places a statutory duty on public authorities in the exercise of their functions to have due regard to the need to eliminate discrimination and advance equality of opportunity between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it (i.e., “the Public Sector Equality Duty”).
In this case, there is no evidence to suggest that the development proposals would have any direct or indirect negative impacts on any person with a protected characteristic or any group of people with a shared protected characteristic.
Human Rights Statement
The specific Articles of the European Commission on Human Rights (‘the ECHR’) relevant to planning include Article 6 (Right to a fair and public trial within a reasonable time), Article 8 (Right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence), Article 14 (Prohibition of discrimination) and Article 1 of Protocol 1 (Right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions and protection of property).
It is considered that assessing the effects that a proposal will have on individuals and weighing these against the wider public interest in determining whether development should be allowed to proceed is an inherent part of the decision-making process. In carrying out this ‘balancing exercise’ in the above report, officers are satisfied that the potential for these proposals to affect any individual’s (or any group of individuals’) human rights has been addressed proportionately and in accordance with the requirements of the ECHR.
Councillor Janet Tait returned to the meeting at 10:55 hours.
Supporting documents: